RPP W6 CWpart1 – Reflection / Thoughts

I’m not looking forward to next term… It was really hard to make my RPP coursework easy – and impossible to get usable answers to questions about it. I’m quite confident that I won’t fail but I’m also sure that I will not get graded any higher than a pass.

My main point of confusion was in describing methods for research (let alone designing them). From the materials, I expect the entire work to involve only literature reviews and base analysis of the severely-limited data found in them.

That’s not really ‘methods’… yet, how could I reasonably plan for more?

The requested work described is completely different to the tutor’s LASSO document, which is the example-supported proposal of a data analysis method. The product was already developed. The ‘research aim’ was to argue the benefits of the developed system’s usage.

I cannot do that, with something that does not yet exist.

We have got anything developed to argue for to my knowledge, we aren’t developing anything, only researching a developments viability – seemingly to result in a supported argument for a development. Due to this weird dynamic, I can see no way to make this coursework’s format similar to the one found in that LASSO document.

Nevertheless, in faithful defeat, I submit the work…

UPDATE: My submission got referred, with comments like “What does this mean?”…